Allowed

Ankur Shrivastav v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi HC2 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./2067/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC. The court granted bail subject to personal and surety bonds and conditions to join investigation, noting that complainant claims were satisfied or would be settled.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 25,000, surety bond, and condition to join investigation.

Ankur Shrivastav Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 2067/2023 & CRL.M.A. 16505/2023

¶4

ANKUR SHRIVASTAV ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Saurabh Chauhan, Mr. Varun Jain and Ms. Reny Chauhan, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent

¶8

Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with SI Kapil Singh PS Timarpur, Delhi

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶11

O R D E R % 02.02.2024

¶12

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 373/2022 under Sections 419/420/120B/464/467/468/471 IPC registered at PS Timarpur, Delhi.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation pursuant to interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 19.07.2023, which position is not disputed by the learned APP for the State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court.

¶14

The learned APP for the State, on instructions, further submits that the petitioner is no more required for any further investigation.

¶15

The learned counsel for petitioner also submits that there are 04

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2024 at 12:42:43

¶18

complainants in the present case and the claims of 02 complainants have already been satisfied whereas with regard to the claims of the remaining 02 complainants the demand drafts were handed over to the IO.

¶19

The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the IO, states that the demand draft of Rs. 29,100/- was handed over to the complainant Trilok Chand Saini, however, the other complainant namely, Sanjeev Kumar has informed the IO that he will be collecting his demand draft after 15.02.2024. 6. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of petitioner being arrested, he be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- and a surety bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer / Arresting Officer, further subject to the condition that he will join investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer concerned.

¶20

The petition stands disposed of.

¶21

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶22

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶23

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶24

FEBRUARY 2, 2024 N.S. ASWAL

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2024 at 12:42:43

Ankur Shrivastav v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankur Shrivastav v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajid & Ors. Vs State of N.C.T. Delhi & Anr.

Kamran Vs the State Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Kamal Sharma @ Kake Vs State

Shri Kishan @ Bablu Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Mohit Vs State of NCT and Delhi & Anr.

Sonu Banjara Vs NCT of Delhi