Disposed

Krishan Deo Ray v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC14 Mar 2024BAIL APPLN./930/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim bail sought under Section 439 CrPC in an NDPS FIR on the ground of the petitioner's son's death. The trial court's interim application was held not maintainable. The High Court granted interim bail for six weeks with conditions and directions to surrender thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail for six weeks on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety, subject to surrender after expiry.

Krishan Deo Ray Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Narcotics (NDPS) | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~55

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 930/2024

¶4

KRISHAN DEO RAY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.S.Das, Mr.O.P.Sharma and Ms.Sia Das, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State with Insp. Robin Tyagi, PS Crime Branch.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 14.03.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 8127/2024

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 930/2024

¶15

An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for grant of interim bail in FIR 01/2021 under Sections 21, 25 & 29 NDPS Act registered at PS: Crime Branch on the ground of death of his son on 07.03.2024.

¶16

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that son of the petitioner had expired on 07.03.2024 but the interim application has been disposed of

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

BAIL APPLN. 930/2024

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/03/2024 at 12:37:46

¶21

by learned trial court as being not maintainable vide order dated 11.03.2024 on account of pendency of bail application before this Court.

¶22

Since the factum of death of the son of the petitioner already stands verified by the police as per reply filed before learned trial court, petitioner is admitted to bail for a period of six weeks from the date of his release on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to following condition:

¶23

(i) Petitioner shall provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer (IO)/SHO concerned at the time of release.

¶24

Petitioner shall surrender before the Superintendent Jail after expiry of the bail period. A report in this regard shall be forwarded to learned Trial Court as well as to Registry of this Court by the Superintendent Jail.

¶25

Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶26

A copy of this order be forwarded to the Superintendent Jail and concerned Trial Court for information and compliance.

¶27

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

MARCH 14, 2024/v

Page 2 of 2

BAIL APPLN. 930/2024

Krishan Deo Ray v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Deo Ray v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Anuj Mani Yadav Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Irshad Ahmad Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ravinder Kumar @ Ravi and Ors. Vs the State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Prakash Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Narender Kumar & Anr. Vs the State & Anr.