Allowed

Deepak v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Delhi HC13 Mar 2024BAIL APPLN./641/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail upon arrest, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety and joining the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety in a like amount, subject to joining the investigation.

Deepak Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 641/2024

¶4

DEEPAK ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Preeti Kumari and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State with SI Arti Singh and HC Hardev, PS Sector-23, Dwarka.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

¶9

BAIL APPLN. 641/2024 & CRL.M.A. 5639/2024

¶10

An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner/applicant for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0294/2023 under Sections 379/411/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sector-23, Dwarka, Delhi.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted interim protection vide order dated 21.02.2024.

¶12

Learned APP for the State on instructions of IO submits that the vehicle bearing registration no. HR-26-EZ-3953 in possession of the petitioner has been seized and it appears that the registration number had been incorrectly reflected as HR-26-EZ-3958. Application is opposed on the ground that co-accused Rahul is yet to be arrested.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/03/2024 at 11:24:50

¶14

Petitioner has already joined the investigation and the vehicle allegedly used in offence has been seized. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances and since no recovery is to be effected at the instance of the petitioner, in the event of arrest, petitioner be admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO, PS concerned and subject to his joining the investigation.

¶15

Application is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶16

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

¶17

MARCH 13, 2024 /akc

¶18

Deepak v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rihan @ Dulare Vs State & Anr.

Sujit Kumar Singh Vs State (Gnct Delhi)

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Mehta & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Anuj Mani Yadav Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Irshad Ahmad Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sonu Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)