Allowed

Vijay@ Veera v. State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Delhi HC12 Mar 2024BAIL APPLN./856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail petitioner sought bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. after an FIR alleging culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Court granted bail subject to personal and surety bonds and cooperation with investigation, noting the injury was simple in nature and accused persons assisted the petitioner initially.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 25,000/-, surety bond of similar amount, and condition to join investigation and cooperate with IO.

Vijay@ Veera Vs State (N.C.T of Delhi) — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~60

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 856/2024

¶4

VIJAY@ VEERA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr M. L. Yadav and Mr Harish Chand, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with SI Kishan Chand, Police Station Bindapur.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 12.03.2024

¶10

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.0691/2023 under Sections 307/34 IPC registered at Police Station Bindapur.

¶11

The case of the prosecution is that on the intervening night of 12/13.10.2023 the police received an information about a fight. When the police reached the spot of incident they found that the injured had been taken to the hospital. When police reached the hospital, the injured made a statement that he has been attacked by six persons, namely, Vijay @ Beera, (present petitioner), Gopal Verma, Suraj Giri, Pawan Punjabi, Aakash @ Chaawal and Vicky Gurjar which led to the registration of the aforesaid FIR.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/03/2024 at 12:37:41

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner invites the attention of the Court to the FIR wherein the petitioner has stated that he was having previous enmity with the accused persons. It is also recorded in the FIR that the injury was simple in nature.

¶15

He further submits that it is the accused persons who had taken the present petitioner to the hospital and the car of the present petitioner was also seized by the police from the compound of the hospital itself. 5. Notice was issued in this petition on 07.03.2024 with a direction to the State to file the status report. The status report has been handed over today in the Court, the same is taken on record. 6. It is not in dispute that the injury suffered by the petitioner is simple in nature. In fact it was the accused persons who had taken the petitioner to the hospital. However, the learned APP submits that the injured was left in the corridor of the hospital but at the same time it is a matter of record that the car of petitioner/accused was seized from the compound of the hospital. Even the MLC of the complainant records that one of the accused Aakash, who is stated to be a friend of the injured brought the injured and admitted him in the hospital.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of petitioner being arrested, he be released on bail subject to his furnishing Personal Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- and a Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer /Arresting Officer further subject to the condition that he will join investigation and extend cooperation as and when directed by the IO concerned.

¶17

The petition stands disposed of.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/03/2024 at 12:37:41

¶20

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶21

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶22

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶23

MARCH 12, 2024/MK

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/03/2024 at 12:37:41

Vijay@ Veera v. State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay@ Veera v. State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Vs State

Saurabh Tripathi Vs State

Naeem Ali and Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Vikash Kumar Mishra Vs State of NCT Delhi

Nongmaithem Jashobanta Singh Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Naresh Dahiya & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.