Dismissed

Sharif Khan v. State Gnct of Delhi

Delhi HC8 Feb 2024BAIL APPLN./3089/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two maintenance bail applications, the High Court of Delhi declined to entertain the petitions at the current stage. The Court noted the trial was nearing its end and the State assured expedited examination of remaining witnesses, denying interim bail but permitting another application if the trial is prolonged.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications dismissed with liberty to approach the Court again if the trial is prolonged; directed Trial Court to fix an early date for examination of remaining witnesses.

Sharif Khan Vs State Gnct of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~3 & 4

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 3089/2023 SHARIF KHAN ..... Applicant Through: Mr. G.S. Sharma, Mr. Narayan Wadia & Mr. Neil Wadia, Advs.

¶4

versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State Inspector Manmeet Singh, PS- Khayala + BAIL APPLN. 3120/2023 SAIF KHAN ALIAS SHAKIL ALIAS SHIBU..... Applicant Through: Mr. G.S. Sharma, Mr. Narayan Wadia & Mr. Neil Wadia, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State Inspector Manmeet Singh, PS- Khayala

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 08.02.2024

¶8

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, at the outset, points out that the trial is at the fag end and only formal witnesses are left to be examined. He submits that all material witnesses have already been examined.

¶9

He further submits that all endeavours will be made to

¶10

conclude the trial in the next five to six months.

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:22:47

¶12

The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the only evidence against the applicant is the statement given by the brother of the deceased and the disclosure statements of the assailants. He submits that the applicants have been in custody for more than six years.

¶13

This Court is conscious of the fact that detention in custody pending completion of trial causes great hardship, however, keeping in mind the fact that trial is at the fag end, the State has assured that no unwarranted adjournments would be taken and all efforts would be made to expedite the examination of the remaining witnesses, this Court does not consider it apposite to entertain the present bail applications at this stage.

¶14

However, liberty is granted to the applicants to approach the Court again in case the trial is prolonged.

¶15

The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶16

It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicants that the learned Trial Court has fixed the date of 18.04.2024 as the next date for examination of the remaining witnesses.

¶17

The learned Trial Court is requested to fix an early date for the said purpose. The learned Trial Court is also requested to expedite the examination of the remaining witnesses.

¶18

A copy of this order be also sent to the learned Trial Court for necessary compliance.

¶19

A copy of this order be placed in both the matters.

¶20

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 8, 2024 “SS”

¶22

Sharif Khan v. State Gnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharif Khan v. State Gnct of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar Mishra Vs Priya Mishra

Sunil Kumar Jain Vs M/S Riya Garments & Anr.

Chetan Ghai Vs Nidhi Ghai

Robin Vs the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Jitender Kumar Jain Vs the State & Anr.

Sunil Rai Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors. through SHO Anti Corruption Branch, Delhi & Ors.