The Court declined to entertain a bail application at this stage as the Trial Court has recently been directed to conclude the trial within six to eight months under an earlier writ petition.
The bail application was dismissed; the applicant is free to file a fresh application if the trial is delayed beyond the directed timeframe.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MAHENDER SINGH @ KARAN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State with SI Suraj Chauhan, PS Amar Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 13.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:24:57
Court for examination.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 ‘KDK’
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:24:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present bail application should be entertained given the recent direction to expedite the trial.
MAHENDER SINGH
THE STATE
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
