Allowed

Mahender Singh Parmar and Ors. v. Union of India and Anrs

Delhi HC12 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./4688/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitors sought quashing of a summoning order issued under the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that cognizance could not be taken as offences were punishable only by fine and the limitation period under Section 468 CrPC had expired without an application for condonation of delay.

What did the court decide?

The order of summoning dated 31.10.2022 in complaint case No. CNR No. DLSW01-011760-2021, Reg. No. CC/1484/2021, under Section 159 read with Section 162/220 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956 and all proc

Mahender Singh Parmar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anrs — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~45

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 4688/2023 & CRL.M.A. 17886/2023

¶4

MAHENDER SINGH PARMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar Gupta with Ms. Nishika Chugh, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ANRS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. T. Hari Hara Sudhan, Mr. Rajdeep, Mr. Salman & Ms. Nupur Grover, Advs.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

¶8

O R D E R % 12.09.2024

¶9

The present petition is filed seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 31.10.2022 in complaint case No. CNR No. DLSW01-011760-2021, Reg. No. CC/1484/2021 under Section 159 read with Section 162/220 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956 ( ‘ the Act ’) issued by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, South West, Delhi against the petitioners.

¶10

Concededly, the complaint was filed against the petitioners for offences under Section 159 and 162 read with Section 220 (3) of the Act. The offences are punishable with fine only.

¶11

In terms of Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘ CrPC ’), no cognizance for such offences which are punishable with fine only can be taken after a period of one year from the knowledge of the offence.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:25:51

¶13

It is not in dispute that the respondent department was aware of the non-filing of the balance sheets. The petitioners are sought to be prosecuted for non-filing of the balance sheets upto financial year 2015 – 2016, whereas the complaint was filed in November, 2021 and the cognizance was taken on 31.10.2022.

¶14

The cognizance in the opinion of this Court could not have been taken.

¶15

It is an admitted case that no application was filed by the respondent under Section 473 of the CrPC seeking condonation of delay.

¶16

In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the order of summoning dated 31.10.2022 in complaint case No. CNR No. DLSW01-011760-2021, Reg. No. CC/1484/2021 under Section 159 read with Section 162/220 (3) and all proceedings emanating therefrom against the petitioners are set aside.

¶17

The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶18

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into other issues raised by the parties.

¶19

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶20

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 “SK”

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:25:51

Mahender Singh Parmar and Ors. v. Union of India and Anrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahender Singh Parmar and Ors. v. Union of India and Anrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H P Agrawal Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. & Anr.

Sumit Bhardwaj Alias Bahman Vs State

Sobhit Chauhan & Ors. Vs NCT of Delhi (through Station House Officer) & Anr.

Sh. Vijay Gupta Vs the NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kameshwar Singh @Manoj Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Gaurav Tokas Vs State NCT of Delhi