Pankaj v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Delhi dismissed a bail application as withdrawn by the petitioner after noting conviction in the underlying trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
PANKAJ .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aakrsh Jha, Adv. for Mr. Shri Singh, Adv.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 19.09.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as petitioner has already been convicted by the learned Trial Court in case FIR No. 329/2017 registered at PS Paharganj, under Sections 376 IPC and 6 POCSO Act.
In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 Pallavi /HT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 02:31:34
PANKAJ
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court