Allowed

Smt. Nazma @ Nazma Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC9 Jul 2024BAIL APPLN./221/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR involving 498A IPC and Muslim Women Protection Act. The interim protection was made absolute following an amicable settlement and non-objection from the complainant, subject to standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection granted vide order dated 19.01.2024 made absolute; applicant released on bail subject to bond and conditions.

Smt. Nazma @ Nazma Parveen Vs State NCT of Delhi — Domestic Violence | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 221/2024

¶4

SMT. NAZMA @ NAZMA PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Tejaswini Verma and Mr. Anish Yadav, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State with SI Munfaij, PS Jamia Nagar. Ms. Ifat Sultana, Advocate for complainant

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶8

By way of present application, the petitioner/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.540/2023 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women Protection of Right on Marriage Act, 2019 at Police Station Jamia Nagar.

¶9

Learned counsels for the parties state that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and will be taking steps to seek quashing of the FIR. It is further stated that the complainant has no objection to the grant of bail.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid, the interim protection granted to the applicant vide order dated 19.01.2024 is made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on bail subject to her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/ - with one surety of like

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:18:07

¶12

amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO of the concerned Police Station and also subject to the following further conditions: -

¶13

(i) At the time of furnishing bail bond, the applicant shall provide the mobile number, which she undertakes to keep operational at all times during the pendency of the trial.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall join the investigation as and when asked.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall inform the concerned Investigating Officer about her current residential address.

¶16

(iv) In case of change of residential addresses/contact details, the applicant shall promptly inform the same to the concerned Investigating Officer/SHO.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly try to get in touch with the complainant or any other prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

(vi) The applicant shall regularly appear before the trial Court.

¶19

The application is disposed of in the above terms.

¶20

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶21

JULY 9, 2024 p

¶22

Smt. Nazma @ Nazma Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nazma @ Nazma Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kishore Vs State NCT of Delhi

Jeewan Lal & Anr. Vs the State & Anr.

Raj Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Imam Sadique Zafar @ Imam Zafar Sadique Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Surender Aggarwal Vs State

Mrs. Savita Gogia Vs M/S. Raghav Timbers through Its Proprietor Mr. Naresh Maheshwari