Petitioner's bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. not pressed by counsel; petition and pending applications disposed of without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with Inspector Ravi Prakash Meena, P.S. Jaffarpur Kalan and Inspector Raj Kumar, Special Branch. Mr. Samarth K. Luthra, Mr. Ashwani Dagar and Mr. Chirag Kakkar, Advocates for Victim.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 14.08.2024
An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of petitioner for regular bail in FIR No. 0104/2019 under Sections 302/201 IPC registered at P.S.: Jaffarpur Kalan.
After party making submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the application.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for petitioner on record, application is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
AUGUST 14, 2024/ kd
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:48:14
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tarun @ Kalu
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
