Allowed

Shubham Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC2 Aug 2024BAIL APPLN./1703/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of snatching a motorbike under Sections 392/34 IPC. The Court imposed conditions to join the investigation and refrain from influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail with a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each and direction to join investigation without influencing witnesses.

Shubham Yadav Vs State NCT of Delhi — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6 & 7

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1703/2024 SHUBHAM YADAV .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Naman Aggarwal, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with Insp. Naveen Kumar, ASI Krishan Kumar, PS: Samaypur Badli.

¶7

BAIL APPLN. 1707/2024 & CRL.M.A. 14771/2024 ABHISHEK SINGH .....Petitioner

¶8

Through: Mr. Naman Aggarwal, Advocate.

¶9

versus

¶10

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for State with Insp. Naveen Kumar, ASI Krishan Kumar, PS: Samaypur Badli.

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶12

¶13

O R D E R 02.08.2024

¶14

These petitions have been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR no. 30/2024, registered at PS Samaypur Badli, under Sections 392/34 IPC.

¶15

This Court vide order dated 14^th May, 2024, while issuing notice had noted the background facts and granted interim protection from arrest to the

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2024 at 11:51:33

¶18

petitioners.

¶19

Essentially, the allegation is of snatching a motor bike from the complainant, post the quarrel.

¶20

The accused are the two petitioners and one Rajesh. The recovery of motor bike was from the co-accused Rajesh, who has since got bail from the Trial Court.

¶21

APP for State states on instructions that the petitioners have joined the investigation and the charge sheet is in the process of being filed.

¶22

In light of the above, the Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Consequently, in the event of arrest the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25, 000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/IO/SHO concerned, further subject to the condition that the petitioner will join investigation as and when directed and not influence any witness/complainant/victim or tamper with evidence of the case.

¶23

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶24

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶25

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶26

AUGUST 2, 2024/RK

¶27

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶28

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2024 at 11:51:33

Shubham Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubham Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Vs State (Nct of Government of Delhi & Anr.

Gourav Vs State & Anr.

Vikash Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi

Aarushi Lekhwani Vs the State & Ors.

Shri Varun Rajput Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Guddu Yadav Vs State & Anr.