Section 37 arbitration appeal challenging a sole arbitrator's order under a lease deed was withdrawn by the appellants to pursue a settlement offer before the arbitrator; the appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn with no observations on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
VIKAS GHAI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 06.02.2024
I.A. 2810/2024 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
ARB. A. (COMM.) 10/2024 & I.A. 2809/2024 (stay)
Page 1 of 2
ARB. A. (COMM.) 10/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:25:30
directions. He states that the appellants will not seek adjournments on this ground before the learned Arbitrator.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024 SS/
Page 2 of 2
ARB. A. (COMM.) 10/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:25:30
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Section 37 appeal against the arbitrator's order dated 26.12.2023 be permitted to be withdrawn?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Matchless Cafe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Vikas Ghai
Anr.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
