Allowed

Reliance Elektrik Works v. Volts Energy Incorporation

Delhi HC6 Feb 2024ARB.P./756/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court, in an order under Section 11(6), referred the disputes between petitioner and respondent to arbitration under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre rules pursuant to their purchase order agreement, waiving costs due to absence.

What did the court decide?

Disputes referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC); costs waived.

Reliance Elektrik Works Vs Volts Energy Incorporation — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 756/2023 RELIANCE ELEKTRIK WORKS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjoy Bhaumik, Advocate.

¶4

versus

¶5

VOLTS ENERGY INCORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Kapoor, Ms. Seema Yadav and Mr. Aditya, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 06.02.2024

¶9

Pursuant to the order dated 05.02.2024, Mr. Rajeev Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent, appears before the Court and apologises for his absence yesterday. At the request of Mr. Kapoor, the costs ordered to be paid, are waived.

¶10

By way of this petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising between the parties under a purchase order dated 13.02.2023 [“Purchase Order”]. The Purchase Order contains an arbitration clause (Clause 13), which provides for adjudication of disputes by arbitration conducted in Delhi.

¶11

Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration by a legal notice dated 19.06.2023. The said notice failed to elicit a response.

¶12

Mr. Kapoor states that although time was taken on three occasions

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

ARB.P. 756/2023

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:25:33

¶16

for filing of a reply, no reply is in fact required and the existence of the arbitration agreement is admitted. He seeks reference to arbitration, reserving the rights of the respondent to raise all permissible defences before the learned Arbitrator.

¶17

Having regard to the above, with the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the disputes are referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”]. DIAC is requested to nominate an Arbitrator from its panel.

¶18

The arbitration proceedings will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator.

¶19

The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶20

It is made clear that all rights and contentions of the parties are reserved for adjudication before the learned Arbitrator.

¶21

The original Purchase Order dated 13.02.2023, be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶22

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 SS/

¶24

Page 2 of 2

¶25

ARB.P. 756/2023

¶26

Reliance Elektrik Works v. Volts Energy Incorporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance Elektrik Works v. Volts Energy Incorporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S A.K. Builders Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Engineering Service Department)

Adisri Business Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Footprints Childcare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Aditya Thermopack Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Mahinder Kumar Vs Darwin Platform Group of Companies

Mahinder Kumar Vs Darwin Platform Group of Companies

M/S Matchless Cafe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Vikas Ghai & Anr.