Allowed

Praveen Jain v. M/S Kamakhya Oil Company & Ors.

Delhi HC11 Jan 2024ARB.P./961/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, the Delhi High Court, noting a valid arbitration agreement in the Partnership Deed, appointed Justice Najmi Waziri as the sole arbitrator to conduct proceedings under DIAC rules.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under DIAC rules.

Praveen Jain Vs M/S Kamakhya Oil Company & Ors. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~3

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 961/2023

¶4

PRAVEEN JAIN ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Mr. Nishi Kant Singh and Mr. Vinayak Mishra, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S KAMAKHYA OIL COMPANY & ORS. ..... Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra and Ms. Sneh Somani, Advocates.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

¶10

¶11

O R D E R 11.01.2024

¶12

By way of the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (‘A&C Act’), the petitioner seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that are stated to have arisen with the respondents from Deed of Admission-cum-Reconstitution of Partnership Firm dated 11.04.2017 (‘Partnership Deed’).

¶13

Notice on this petition was issued on 19.09.2023.

¶14

Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this court to clause 17 of the Partnership Deed which

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. ARB.P. 961/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:04:01

¶16

Page 1 of 3

¶17

comprises the arbitration agreement; and contemplates reference of disputes between the parties to arbitration in accordance with the A&C Act.

¶18

For completeness, it may be recorded that a separate territorial jurisdiction provision is also contained in clause 18 of the Partnership Deed, which subjects the contract between the parties to the jurisdiction of competent courts at Delhi.

¶19

As per the record, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Notice dated 07.07.2023; and it transpires that respondent No. 2 responded to the said notice vide reply dated 09.08.2023 unilaterally appointing a Sole Arbitrator. However, the petitioner has objected to such unilateral appointment vide his reply dated 14.08.2023.

¶20

Upon a conspectus of the averments contained in the petition, the stand taken by the respondents, and the submissions made, this court is satisfied that there is a valid and subsisting arbitration agreement between the parties; that this court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and decide the present petition; and also that the disputes that are stated to have arisen between the parties, as set-out inter-alia in invocation notice dated 07.07.2023, do not appear ex-facie to be non-arbitrable.

¶21

In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the parties now jointly request that this court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator; and then refer the matter for arbitration under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, New Delhi (‘DIAC’), keeping all their respective factual and legal contentions open.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. ARB.P. 961/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:04:01

¶23

Page 2 of 3

¶24

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri, former Judge, Delhi High Court (Cellphone No.: +91 9810097311) is appointed as the learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties; with arbitration proceedings to be conducted under the aegis of the DIAC, in accordance with applicable rules.

¶25

The learned Sole Arbitrator would furnish to the parties requisite disclosures as required under section 12 of the A&C Act; and in the event there is any impediment to the appointment on that count, the parties are given liberty to file an appropriate application in this court.

¶26

The learned Arbitrator shall then proceed with the arbitral proceedings in accordance with the rules and regulations of DIAC and subject to arbitrator’s fee and arbitration costs, as may be applicable.

¶27

All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Sole Arbitrator on merits, in accordance with law.

¶28

A copy of this order be communicated forthwith to the Co-ordinator, DIAC, for information and compliance.

¶29

A copy of this order be sent by e-mail to the learned Sole Arbitrator, as also to learned counsel for the parties.

¶30

The petition stands disposed-of in the above terms.

¶31

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶32

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶33

JANUARY 11, 2024/ uj

¶34

This is a digitally signed order. ARB.P. 961/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:04:01

¶35

Page 3 of 3

Praveen Jain v. M/S Kamakhya Oil Company & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen Jain v. M/S Kamakhya Oil Company & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asad Mueed & Anr. Vs Hammad Ahmed & Ors.

S. Jaspreet Singh Proprietor M/S. Metro Lubes Vs Usha Malik, Proprietor M/S. Vanshika Trading Co.

M K Malik & Anr. Vs Siddharth Malik & Anr.

Pradeep Agrawal & Anr. Vs S. S. Brijbasi & Sons & Ors.

Dharamvir and Co. Vs Delhi Development Authority

Praveen Jain Vs M/S Kamakhya Oil Company & Ors.