Allowed

Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Mani Kumar. v Proprietor of M/S Devi Electricals

Delhi HC14 May 2024ARB.P./453/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi appointed Mr. Harish Dudani as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a distributor agreement between the petitioner and respondent, following the petitioner's notice invoking arbitration due to outstanding dues.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Harish Dudani, District Judge (Retired), as sole arbitrator; fees fixed per Fourth Schedule or by consent; conduct under Delhi International Arbitration Centre.

Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mani Kumar. v… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision: 14th May, 2024

¶4

- ARB.P. 453/2024

¶5

NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL AND DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.

¶6

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Dhar and Mr. Ankush M. Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

MANI KUMAR. V PROPRIETOR OF M/S DEVI ELECTRICALS

..... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶13

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶14

The present Petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 1996” ) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking appointment of a sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes having arisen between the parties. 2. It is submitted in the petition that the petitioner is a Company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Kalpataru Square, Kondivita Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai, is engaged in the business of manufacturing and rendering services relating to Electrical products in India.

¶15

The respondent, a proprietorship firm was appointed as the Authorised Distributor Stockist of the petitioner Company for Central Region as per the terms agreed between them since the year 2010. The

¶16

Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:SAHIL SHARMA

¶17

ARB.P. 453/2024 Page 1 of 3

¶18

Signing Date: 18.0 5.2024 00:12:02

¶19

petitioner and the respondent entered into Distributor Stockist Agreement dated 04.07.2022.

¶20

The petitioner Company duly supplied and delivered the consignments to the respondent on various dates and used to issue Invoices against such consignments. 5. Since the year 2020, the respondent started failing in making payments to the petitioner against the Invoices, details of which are given in the petition. A sum of Rs.1,73,81,193/- is due to the respondent from 31.12.2020 till 14.04.2022. In addition, adjustment of Rs.26,34,793/- was made by the petitioner with respect to respondent’s account and after adjustment the total amount outstanding from the respondent is Rs.2,00,15,986/-.

¶21

The petitioner sent reminders to the respondent for payment of outstanding amount and despite efforts, the respondent has not paid the balance amount to the Petitioner. 7. The petitioner issued a Notice dated 12.12.2023 invoking Arbitration by referring disputes to a sole Arbitrator which was delivered to the respondent on 15.12.2023. The petitioner did not receive any response to the Notice and thus, filed the present petition for appointment of Arbitrator.

¶22

In view of the above, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the present petition is allowed and Mr. Harish Dudani, learned District Judge (Retired), Mobile No.9910384728 is hereby appointed as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. 9. The parties are at liberty to raise their respective objections before the Arbitrator.

¶23

The fees of the learned Arbitrator would be fixed in accordance with

¶24

Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:SAHIL SHARMA Signing Date: 18.0 5.2024 00:12:02

¶25

ARB.P. 453/2024 Page 2 of 3

¶26

the Fourth Schedule of the Act, 1996 or as consented by the parties.

¶27

This is subject to the Arbitrator making necessary disclosure as under Section 12(1) of the Act, 1996 and not being ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Act, 1996.

¶28

The arbitration shall be conducted under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court.

¶29

The parties are directed to contact the Arbitrator within one week of being communicated a copy of this Order to them by the Registry of this Court.

¶30

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶31

(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

¶32

JUDGE

¶33

MAY 14, 2024 va

¶34

Signature Not Verified

¶35

ARB.P. 453/2024 Page 3 of 3

¶36

DigitallySigned By:SAHIL SHARMA Signing Date: 18.0 5.2024 00:12:02

Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Mani Kumar. v Proprietor of M/S Devi Electricals

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Mani Kumar. v Proprietor of M/S Devi Electricals

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Karpal Kaur Reen Vs Shri Ritesh Raj

Amandeep Singh Uberoi Vs Tripping Mr Pink Private Limited

Union of India & Anr. Vs M/S Dharma Productions Private Limited & Ors.

Vrentin Tech Private Limited Vs Udit Gogoi

Mahinder Singh Vs Jaswant Kaur & Ors.

Atul Choudhary Vs Jeetu Choudhary & Ors.