Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act petition seeking interim measures over an amount awarded under an arbitral award was disposed of without granting relief, leaving all petitioner's remedies open in the ongoing enforcement proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
PROMAX POWER LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinit Trehan & Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates.
versus
TAHAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates alongwith AR of the Company.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 15.05.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MAY 15, 2024/ ‘pv’/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:09:35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim protection could be sought under Section 9 for the amount awarded under an arbitral award dated 31.01.2024 pending enforcement proceedings?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Promax Power Ltd.
Tahal Consulting Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
