Disposed

Zenith Electrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Dna Projects and Anr.

Delhi HC22 May 2024ARB.P./240/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Delhi High Court appointed Mr. Tariq Khan as arbitrator to resolve contract disputes arising from three Work Orders with the consent of the parties, ordering the proceedings under DIAC rules.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Tariq Khan as sole arbitrator; referral of disputes under three Work Orders to arbitration under DIAC rules.

Zenith Electrotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dna Projects and Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~1

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 240/2024

¶4

ZENITH ELECTROTECH PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Ajay Chaudhary & Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhagat, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

DNA PROJECTS AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr. Preetpal Singh & Ms. Neha Narang, Advocates for R-1 & 2.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 22.05.2024

¶9

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under three Work Orders, two dated 27.07.2021 and one dated 05.08.2021. All the Work Orders contain an arbitration clause.

¶10

Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration by a communication dated 17.10.2022 in respect of the three Work Orders. The said communication did not elicit a response.

¶11

Mr. Asheesh Jain, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that subject to all rights and contentions of the respondents being left open, an arbitrator may be appointed to adjudicate the disputes.

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

ARB.P. 240/2024

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:30:40

¶15

Having regard to the above, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶16

a. Disputes between the parties under the three Work Orders, two dated 27.07.2021 and one dated 05.08.2021, are referred to arbitration of Mr. Tariq Khan, Advocate [Tel: 9999663628].

¶17

b. The arbitration will be held under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi-110503 [“DIAC”], and will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to the remuneration of the learned Arbitrator.

¶18

c. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶19

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication before the learned Arbitrator.

¶20

The petition stands disposed of with these directions.

¶21

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶22

MAY 22, 2024 ‘pv’/

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

ARB.P. 240/2024

¶25

Zenith Electrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Dna Projects and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zenith Electrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Dna Projects and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chrysalis Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sattvam India Ventures Private Limited & Ors.

Virender Kumar Jain Vs Jagtar Singh Walia & Ors.

Atul Sethi Vs Orchid Infrastructure Develoers Pvt. Ltd.

Italian Thai Development Public Comoany Ltd. Vs NTPC Ltd.

Mr Satish Kumar Kohli and Ors. Vs M/S Centium Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Vogelsang India Private Limited Vs Central Organisation for Modernisation of Workshops, through Its Principal Chief Administrative Off