Vikas Goel v. Seema Sejwal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the arbitration petition with liberty to reapproach after notice under Section 21 of the 1996 Act is issued to the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw; updated file details to reflect liberty.
What the court decided
$~3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- ARB.P. 201/2024 and I.A. 3429/2024
VIKAS GOEL
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Dubey and Mr. Sarthak Dubey, Advocates
versus
SEEMA SEJWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Maliyan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 16.08.2024
1. After some hearing, Mr. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to reapproach the Court after issuance of a notice to the respondent under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) and awaiting a response from the respondent in that regard.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vikas Goel
- respondent
Seema Sejwal
Coram
C. Hari Shankar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court