The petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the A&C Act. Upon parties submitting a settlement agreement, the petition was dismissed as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Paran Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Sukrit Kohli, Legal Manager.
versus ANKIT JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shalini Sinha, Adv. (VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 09.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:58:57
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024/AR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:58:57
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
ANKIT JAIN
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
