Dismissed

Paramveer Singh Sachdeva & Anr. v. Tushar Chhabra & Anr.

Delhi HC23 Jul 2024ARB.P./1073/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. With mutual consent, the court referred the dispute to Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Goel for adjudication under DIAC rules.

What did the court decide?

The dispute was referred to arbitration before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Goel; the petition stands disposed of.

Paramveer Singh Sachdeva & Anr. Vs Tushar Chhabra & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~40

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1073/2024 PARAMVEER SINGH SACHDEVA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhruv Pande, Mr. Randeep Sachdeva, Mr. Shivaang Gupta, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

TUSHAR CHHABRA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anish Gupta, Ms. Raina Anand, Advocates [9560322297].

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 23.07.2024

¶9

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“the Act”], seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under a Collaboration Agreement dated 21.10.2020 [“the Agreement”].

¶10

Clause 47 of the Agreement provides for resolution of disputes by arbitration. Jurisdiction under the Agreement is also vested in Courts in New Delhi.

¶11

Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioners invoked the arbitration clause by a legal notice dated 29.06.2024. The respondents, by their reply dated 08.07.2024, did not dispute the existence of the arbitration clause, but parties were unable to achieve consensus on the identity of the arbitrator.

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

ARB.P. 1073/2024

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:01:08

¶15

Mr. Anish Gupta, learned counsel, appears on advance notice on behalf of the respondents, and submits that an independent arbitrator may be appointed to adjudicate the claims and counter claims of the parties. 5. Having regard to the above, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the disputes between the parties under the Agreement dated 21.10.2020, are referred to arbitration of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vinod Goel, former Judge of this Court [Tel: 9910384637].

¶16

The arbitration proceedings will be held under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi [“DIAC”], and will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned arbitrator.

¶17

The learned arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

¶18

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

¶20

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶21

JULY 23, 2024 “Bhupi”/

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

ARB.P. 1073/2024

¶24

Paramveer Singh Sachdeva & Anr. v. Tushar Chhabra & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramveer Singh Sachdeva & Anr. v. Tushar Chhabra & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zamil Air Conditioners India Private Limited Vs National Insurance Company Ltd.

M/S Smas Auto Leasing India Private Limited Vs M/S Ozo Agri Care Private Limited

Dynamic Realinfra Private Limited Vs Ssndata Solutions Private Limited and Anr.

M/S Isosceles Sales and Services Pvt.Ltd Vs Crompton Greaves Limited

Ms Jas Toll Road Company Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority of India through the Project Director Piu Chitradurga

Oriano Clean Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ampin Energy Transition Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.