Election petition concerning computation of election expenditure was unconditionally withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel; the court dismissed it as withdrawn, noting a reservation to seek statutory or regulatory intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
ARVIND KEJRIWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Ms. Sheenu Priya, Mr. Atik Gill, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
%
19.09.2024
PRATEEK JALAN, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 ‘Bhupi’/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:56:56
Vijender Gupta
Arvind Kejriwal
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
