Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition which was allowed and dismissed as withdrawn by the court on the application of no objection from respondent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
Through: Mr. Saurabh Kripal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Suri, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Sunil, Advocate. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Ms. Abhipriya Mr. Anlik, Advocates for ED.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 15.01.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
JANUARY 15, 2024 sk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:41:27
Deepak Talwar
Union of India
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
