Disposed

Chandra Sen Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/594/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of this petition without hearing, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation of 07 Dec 2023 within eight weeks in light of the O.P. Nimesh judgment, regarding delayed financial upgradation and displeasure order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider petitioner's representation dated 07.12.2023 and dispose of it within eight weeks.

Chandra Sen Singh Vs Union of India & Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 594/2024 CHANDRA SEN SINGH

¶4

..... Petitioner Through: Dr. S.S. Hooda, Adv. with Mr. Aayushman Aeron, Adv.

¶5

versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Ms. Archana Kumari, GP, Ms. Usha Jamnal & Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advs. for UOI

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 16.01.2024

¶8

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following

¶9

prayers:-

¶10

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

¶11

a) Call for the records of the case and summon the Court of Inquiry held in respect of the Petitioner; and

¶12

b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to grant Non-Functional Financial Upgradation to the Petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2022; and

¶13

c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside order dated 26.08.2021

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:44:47

¶16

passed by the Directorate General Border Security Force awarding Director General’s Displeasure to the Petitioner.

¶17

d) Award cost of litigation in favour of the Petitioner; and

¶18

e) Pass such further or other order, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶19

Mr. Farman Ali, Advocate who appears for the respondents submits that the petitioner had submitted a representation dated December 07, 2023 praying for the relief as sought for by the petitioner in this petition. He also states that the said representation shall be considered and decided, keeping in view the instructions issued by the Government of India and the judgment, as relied upon by the petitioner in the case of Dr. O.P.Nimesh v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No.2466/2017 , decided on October 22, 2018 and annexed as Annexure P-10, within a period of eight weeks, as an outer limit.

¶20

Noting the submission made by Mr.Ali, the present petition is disposed of, directing consideration / disposal of the representation dated December 07, 2023 submitted by the petitioner, keeping in view the instructions and the judgment, as relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of eight weeks, as an outer limit.

¶21

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶22

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶23

JANUARY 16, 2024 /ak

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:44:47

Chandra Sen Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Sen Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuvansh Prasad Singh Vs the Government Ofn.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.

Am Mining India Private Limited Vs Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors.

M/S Steel Authority of India Limited (Sail) Vs Union of India & Anr.

Jk Tyre and Industries Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Dr. Rohini Pakhiddey

Subhojit Chatterjee Vs Union of India and Ors..

Shri Venkateshwar Constructions-Vdb Projectes (P) Ltd. (Jv) Vs Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt of India

Ms Shivansh Associates Vs Ms Roop Raj Banquet Restro Bar and Ors.

N Ramaseshan . Vs Union of India and Ors.

Col Vinod Dahiya Vs Union of India and Ors.

Rohan Chetry and Ors. Vs Staff Selection Commission and Ors.

Ic 44038K Maj Gen H Dharmarajan Vs Principal Registrar and Ors.

Gantavya Gulati Vs Directorate of Recruitment, Indian Coast Guard

Deepak Kumar and Ors. Vs Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.