Writ petition disposed of as not pressed after petitioner submitted that the respondent had granted the sought approval.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
JINDAL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate
versus
PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh and Mr. Divesh Kumar, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 23.01.2024
1. Mr. Sharawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that approval as sought by his client has been granted by the Respondent and that, therefore, his client is not pressing this petition.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 23, 2024
yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:18:31
JINDAL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY
PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
