Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the grievance no longer subsists, respondents having acted on the petitioner's representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
Through: Mr. Sameer Rohatgi and Mr. Kartikey Singh, Advocates.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (C) for GNCTD with Mr. Arun Panwar, Mr. Rishabh Srivastava, Mr. Pradyumn Rao, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Ms. Nikita Vir and Ms. Prashansa Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 07.02.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:04:41
M/S Indo Spirits
Commissioner of Excise Govt of NCT of Delhi
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
