Petitioner sought directions against Respondent No.2 under Article 226 via this writ petition. After arguments, the Senior Counsel on instructions withdrew the petition. The Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn and also disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~86
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Tare and Ms. Kanak Grover, Advocates
versus
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Sudhir Sharma and Ms. Vandana Yadav, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 10.07.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 10, 2024/kks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/07/2024 at 16:12:27
AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION
JYOTI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
