Court accepted assurance from respondents that a decision in pending disciplinary proceedings would be taken within six weeks. The application to revive the writ petition was disposed of subject to this undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
AVISHAR KATIYAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abir Phukan and Ms. Rishika Radhakrishnan, Advocates.
versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel for FCI and Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advocate for FCI/respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 18.12.2024
CM APPL. 59971/2024
W.P.(C) 9304/2023
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:08
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 18, 2024/YA
W.P.(C) 9304/2023
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:08
AVISHAR KATIYAR
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.
JYOTI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
