The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition, stating that the relief prayed for was already satisfied. The High Court allowed the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
M/S PRESTIGE AGRO-TECH LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.K.R. Das, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, Mr. Maulik Khurrana, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R % 11.09.2024
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
j/ak
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:59:51
M/S PRESTIGE AGRO-TECH LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AND ORS.
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
