cancellation of his candidature for NEET (PG)-2023. But, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not deem it appropriate to rely solely on the miscommunicated email dated 07.08.2023, which is factually incorrect due to human error and is contrary to the findings of the Examination Ethics Committee given and duly recorded and documented on 13.06.2023 itself. Therefore, it is not as if the findings have been reviewed or fresh and additional findings have been given in the year 2024 to fall under category of being „reviewed‟. 21. The undisputed and unchallenged fact that the petitioner herein had misrepresented that he was eligible to appear in the NEET (PG)2023, though he was not eligible to appear in the same also weighs in the mind of this Court. In this regard, this Court notes that at the time of applying for NEET (PG)-2023, the petitioner herein, though had appeared for FMGE December 2022 Session, the results of the same had yet not been declared and the petitioner had yet not qualified the same. Further, since the results of FMGE had not been declared, he could not have got himself registered with either a State Medical Council or Medical Council of India. However, the petitioner, admittedly, did not fulfill these requirements, which were mandatory in nature, at the time of submitting his application for NEET (PG)2023, and therefore, he had indulged in an act of furnishing false information and using „unfair means‟.
