This order dismisses a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear to press the matter. No substantive legal question was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
.....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Khark, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:18:25
Surbhi Sharma
The Deputy Commissioner and Ors
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
