(i) In this regard, it is submitted that the documents provided by the Petitioner i.e. 10 Vakalatnamas and 48 appearances (Annnexure-'B') with his representation were verified by the sub-committee in compliance of meeting dated 29.05.2017 (Annexure-'C') of the LCAC and vide its report dated 07.06.2017 (Annexure-'D"), only 38 appearances and 4 Vakalatnamas were considered by the sub-committee. As per the report, 6 more Vakalatnamas and 10 more appearances that were internet generated copies, had also been filed by the petitioner but they were beyond the period mentioned in the application form for allotment of chamber at Rohini Courts Complex i.e 02.01.2006 till 28.02.2013, as invited vide notification dated 23.03.2013. The Committee also gave remark that ‘even the 4 Vakalatnama being considered do not bear the name of the applicant but his signatures only'. Further, the Committee had also submitted in the said report that "All the Vakalatnama so filed are copies of CC (certified copy) (OSR) and appearances so filed appear to be self typed copies and the said fact has also been admitted by the applicant during interaction with the Member Secretary, LCAC on 01.06.2017, Further, none of them could be verified through internet either".
