Allowed

M/S Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC21 May 2024W.P.(C)/13033/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fair Price Shop license was cancelled because the licensee failed to produce title documents of the tenanted premises. The court held a tenant cannot produce ownership title, found the cancellation unsustainable, set aside both impugned orders and directed restoration of the license.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders dated 15.03.2018 and 15.10.2018 set aside; respondents directed to restore FPS license no. 4109 to the petitioner or its lawful successor.

M/S Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan Vs Govt. of NCT… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13033/2019

¶4

M/S SHRI BHAGWAN HARI BHAGWAN ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Malik, ASC for GNCTD

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R

¶9

% 21.05.2024

¶10

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing of order dated 15.03.2018 and order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the respondents no. 3 and 2 whereby the license of the petitioner firm in respect of Fair Price Shop (FPS) bearing no. 4109, situated at 447/100 (Part of A-2/5), Main Road, Maujpur, Delhi was cancelled in an arbitrary manner and with further directions for the restoration of said license.

¶11

It is stated in the petition that in the year 1972, the petitioner was allotted a permanent Fair Price Shop license no. 4109 by the respondent no.3 to distribute essential commodities to the public in Circle no. 67 under the Delhi Specified Articles (Regulation of Distribution), Order 1968, which was renewed from time to time by the respondent no. 3 and lastly, it was renewed upto March, 2018.

¶12

The respondent no. 3 issued a show-cause-notice dated 07.03.2016 to the petitioner to show cause as to why the said license may not be cancelled.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2024 at 11:55:53

¶15

It was alleged in the notice that the petitioner was not functioning in accordance with terms and conditions of the license issued under Delhi Specified Articles (Regulation of Distribution), Order 1968. It was also alleged that the vigilance branch observed that at the time of applying for renewal of FPS license, the licensee i.e. the petitioner had submitted a rent agreement signed by Rama Mishra, land lady of the property and that the petitioner had applied for renewal of license for the period w.e.f. 22.03.2015 to 22.03.2018, then a rent receipt dated 01.07.2015 was submitted by the petitioner which was stated to be issued by a person, namely, Rohit Sharma without mentioning complete address of the property. It is further alleged that the petitioner has not submitted the document regarding transfer of the property from Rama Mishra to Rohit Sharma.

¶16

The petitioner filed a reply dated 17.03.2016 to the show-cause-notice dated 07.03.2016 wherein it was stated that there is a dispute between Rama Mishra and Rohit Sharma regarding ownership of the property bearing no. 4109, situated at 447/100 (Part of A-2/5), Main Road, Maujpur, Delhi, which is stated to be pending for adjudication before the Civil Court, Karkardooma Court, Delhi. 5. Subsequently, the Assistant Commissioner(NE), Food and Supplies Department, vide order dated 15.03.2018 bearing no. F.AC(NE)/F&S/FPS4109/2018/1197-1206 passed the order for cancellation of petitioner’s FPS license bearing no. 4109 on the allegation as stated hereinabove. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority/Special Commissioner (Admn.), Department of Food Supplies and Consumers Affairs bearing appeal no. 01/2018 titled as M/s Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan V The Assistant Commissioner (North-East), Department of

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2024 at 11:55:53

¶19

Food Supplies & Consumers Affairs which was ordered to be dismissed vide order dated 15.10.2018.

¶20

The counsel for the petitioner stated that the license of the petitioner was cancelled in an arbitrary manner and on the basis of reasons which are not relevant for continuance of FPS license bearing no. 4109. Accordingly, the impugned orders are liable to be quashed. 7. Mr. Udit Malik, Additional Standing Counsel for the respondents stated that as the petitioner could not furnish the valid document regarding the ownership/title of the property bearing no. 4109, situated at 447/100 (Part of A-2/5), Main Road, Maujpur, Delhi whereby the Fair Price Shop under the license no. 4109 is situated and submitted different titled documents on different occasions as such, the license in favour of the petitioner was ordered to be cancelled. The present petition is liable to be dismissed. It is further stated and argued that the complaint made by Rohit Sharma was also received and on the basis of said complaint, the departmental enquiry was initiated against the petitioner.

¶21

The counsel for the petitioner stated that Shri Bhagwan who was the proprietor of M/s Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan has expired and was succeeded by the legal heirs as mentioned in amended memo of parties dated 20.02.2023. The surviving legal hairs of Shri Bhagwan, who was the proprietor of M/s Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan executed Authorisation Cum No Objection Certificate in favour of Sunil Kumar, who was one of the surviving legal heirs of Shri Bhagwan.

¶22

The perusal of impugned orders dated 15.03.2018 and 15.10.2018 reflects that the license in favour of M/s Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan was cancelled due to the reasons that the license holder could not produce the

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2024 at 11:55:53

¶24

valid title documents in respect of the property bearing no. 4109, situated at 447/100 (Part of A-2/5), Main Road, Maujpur, Delhi of which the Fair Price Shop was a part as a tenanted premises. It is not within the authority and control of the license holder to produce the ownership title in respect of the entire property. The reasons as stated by the respondents in the show-causenotice as well as the reasons as detailed in the impugned orders dated 15.03.2018 and 15.10.2018 are not valid and cannot be sustained in law. The impugned orders are liable to be set aside.

¶25

Accordingly, the impugned orders dated 15.03.2018 and 15.10.2018 bearing nos. F. AC(NE)/F&S/FPS-4109/2018/1197-1206 and PS/SS(Admn.)/FPS Appeal/F&S/20l8/638-639, respectively, are set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the Fair Price Shop license bearing no. 4109 in favour of the M/s Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan, a proprietorship firm or its lawful/authorised successor in accordance with law.

¶26

The present petition along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

¶27

The respondents shall be at liberty to initiate proceedings for cancellation of license in accordance with law and rules and regulations.

¶28

DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J

¶29

MAY 21, 2024 N/AK

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/05/2024 at 11:55:53

M/S Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Shri Bhagwan Hari Bhagwan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Sharma Vs Insurance Ombudsman and Anr.

Sks College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.

Shri Guru Ram Das Institute of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.

Sardar Ajit Singh College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Padhy Vs National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

Dharminder Sarna Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Ankit Agarwal -Legal Heir of Late Shanti Kumar Aggarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Saksham Commodities Limited Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 22(1), Delhi & Anr.

Sabana Saifi Vs Ministry of Telecommunication and Ors.

Mona Aggarwal & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Mamta @ Anita Vs Sh. Laxmi Narayan and Ors.

Sh. Ram Narayan Yadav Vs Chambers Allotment Committee through Its Chairperson and Ors.

Parikshit Mahipal Vs the Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee and Anr.

Albatross Shipping Limited Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Customs & Ors.