Writ petition dismissed in default as the petitioner, unrepresented on multiple dates and absent on third call, showed no interest in prosecuting the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~110
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Tanwar, Mr. Rajdev Kumar, Mr. Hitesh Batra and Mr. Shivam Srivastava, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Sonam, Advocate for the Respondent No.2/SSC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 24.09.2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 24, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:34:54
Vishal Verma
Union of India
SSC
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
