The petitioner moved to withdraw the present writ petition as it had become infructous. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Mr. Krishnagopal Abhay, Mr. Venugopal Abhay and Ms. Pari Bhardwaj, Advocates (through VC).
versus
THE FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R % 16.08.2024
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
AUGUST 16, 2024/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2024 at 12:24:24
Prashant Kumar
The Faculty of Law, University of Delhi & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
