Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition; the Division Bench permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition along with the pending application as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application also dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Nitinjya Chaudhry, Sr. Panel counsel Mr.Gokul Sharma, GP, Mr.Rahul Mourya, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 14.11.2024
The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the present petition.
The petition as well as the pending application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2024 RN/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/11/2024 at 12:38:54
Bhumika Pathania
Union of India and Ors
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
