Petitioner sought quashing of an order imposing a seven-year debarment from an examination. Counsel sought withdrawal to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, citing L. Chandra Kumar; the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Shaurya Rai, Govt. Pleader.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R
% 04.07.2024
“a) Issue a writ, order or direction quashing the impugned order dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure-P/1), and directing the Respondent to lift the debarment of seven years on the Petitioner from taking the Examination”
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 4, 2024/ jg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:45:37
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and OthersReferred¶2
(1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
Malkesh Meena
Union of India
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
