The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition during pendency as her grievance was mitigated. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
REKHA SHETTY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shanu Baghel, Advocate
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Yadav, ASC for MCD Mr. Dhruv Gautam, Mr. Tushar Tyagi and Mr. Abhishek Tongar, Advocates for respondent No.2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 03.07.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 3, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:32:40
Rekha Shetty
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Others
Purushandra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
