The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking several reliefs under Article 226. The petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, relying on a Supreme Court judgment.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
SATISH KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Mudgil, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Mohit Mudgal, Ms. Eti Kushwaha and Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocates.
versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr.N.K. Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for Respondents/GNCTD.
CORAM:
JYOTI SINGH, J
JULY 2, 2024 B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:22:09
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and OthersReferred¶10
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
GNCT OF DELHI
JYOTI SINGH
B.S. ROHELLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
