D.T.C. v. Anant Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
DTC challenged the Industrial Tribunal's refusal to approve termination of a conductor for non-issuance of tickets. The High Court found no evidence had been produced before the Tribunal to prove misconduct, found no error in its appraisal, upheld the award, and dismissed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
None granted; writ petition and pending applications dismissed, Tribunal award upheld.
What the court decided
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of order : 19th February, 2024 + W.P.(C) 8615/2003 & CM APPL.5818/2003 D.T.C. ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms.Manisha Tyagi and Mr.Harsh Chaudhary, Advocates
versus
ANANT RAM ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.__, Advocate (Appearance not given)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
ORDER
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)
- The instant writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
"(a) pass a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/direction or order to quash the order dated and order dated 26.20.2003 in O.P.No.21/92 passed by Ld. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Delhi and approval of the action taken may be granted.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal's rejection of DTC's application under Section 33(2)(b) ID Act for approval of the workman's termination was legally tenable.
Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the employer failed to prove the alleged misconduct of ticket non-issuance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.T.C.
- respondent
Anant Ram
Coram
Chandra Dhari Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court