Writ petition by a trade union against the Union of India was rendered infructuous; the court closed the petition and pending applications, keeping the question of law open for adjudication in an appropriate matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
Through: Mr S.B. Tripathi, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Vivek Goyal with Mr Gokul Sharma, Advocates for R1. Ms Prema Priyadarshini with Mr Priyansh Kanwar, Advocates for R8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 04.09.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024 / tr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 22:21:03
Indian National Trade Union Congress
Union of India & Ors.
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
