Writ petition concerning payment of INR 75,000, which was received after filing; petitioner's counsel stated the grievance stood redressed and the petition was disposed of.
Payment of INR 75,000 received by petitioner prior to disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MS. X .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms. Snigdha, Mr. Nitin Kumar Nayak and Ms. Jasmine, Advocates.
versus
DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, SOUTH DISTRICT, SAKET AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Mr. Mirza Amir Baig and Mr. Abdul Wahid, Advocates for DSLSA. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Yash Upadhyay and Mr. Siddhant Dutt, Advocates for R-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 04.10.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 4, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:46:12
MS. X
DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, SOUTH DISTRICT, SAKET AND ORS
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
