Writ petition seeking a direction to the CIC to decide a pending second RTI appeal concerning denial of information about a skill typing test result. The court declined out-of-turn listing but allowed the Petitioner to file an urgency application before the CIC, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
Through: Mr. Vikesh Rathi, Advocate.
versus
THE CHIEF INFORMATION. COMMISSIONER .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
03.10.2024
1 “RTI Act”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2024 at 11:52:00
Commissioner2 on 22nd February, 2024, which has been acknowledged through communication dated 21st March, 2024. Hence, the Petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court seeking a direction to CIC to decide the Petitioner’s appeal expeditiously.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 3, 2024 nk
2 “CIC”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2024 at 11:52:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the CIC to decide the Petitioner's second appeal under the RTI Act expeditiously.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
MS SHEETAL
THE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
