The petitioner did not appear despite second call. The court dismissed the petition and accompanying applications in default as the petitioner seemed uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
YEZDI SAM COOPER ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Chirag Jamwal and Mr.Saksham Deswal, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R % 07.02.2024
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take passover or an adjournment even on second call.
It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The petition along with accompanying applications is thus dismissed in default.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024 SV/AV
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:36:46
YEZDI SAM COOPER
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
