This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3(SDB)
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 8035/2024 & CM APPL. 24290/2025
SHABNAM BURNEY ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Prasanna J., Ms. Rupali Samuel, Ms. Devika Tulsiani & Mr. Soutik Banerjee, Advs. (M: 9953585631) versus UNION OF INDIA& ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms.. Aakriti Garg, Advs. with Ms. Harshita Maheshwari, Pr. Director P.K.Jha, Mr. Pranav Siroha. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur (Standing Counsel DDA), Ms. Deeksha L. Kakar (Panel Lawyer, DDA), Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv., Ms. Kavya Shukla, Adv., Mr. Rashneet Singh, Ms. Sana Parveen Adv. Officers Present: Harish Chandra Sharma (Deputy Director PMAY), Vishwajeet Gahlot (AD PMAY). (M: 9313119255) Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. A.K. Mishra, Adv. with MLA Tarvinder Singh Marwah.
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 25.04.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:07:59
CM APPL. 24290/2025 in W.P.(C) 8035/2024
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.
APRIL 25, 2025 dj/Ar.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:07:59
SHABNAM BURNEY
UNION OF INDIA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
