The Court allowed an application for rectification to correct typographical errors regarding the date of the petitioner's husband's death and his name in the judgment of W.P.(C) 7871/2022.
Application allowed; judgment rectified regarding date of death and name; corrigendum issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
SMT SHAIL KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.P. Toms and Mr. Piyush Mehra, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sushil Raaja SPC-UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
CM APPL. 26455/2024
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.05.2024 13:09:23
Dinesh Kumar Mishra in place of late Shiv Kumar Mishra in Para 23. Learned counsel submits that the name too be corrected.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
MAY 6, 2024 /ms
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:0 9.05.2024 13:09:23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for rectification of clerical and typographical errors in the judgment dated 16.04.2024 is maintainable.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT SHAIL KUMARI
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
