Writ petition seeking correction of petitioners' seniority following a respondent order. Court directed the respondent to treat the petition as a representation and dispose of it within four weeks with an opportunity for representative petitioner hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh with Ms. Suhani Mathur and Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advocates.
versus
THE LD DISTRICT AND SESSIOIN JUDGE (HQS)
..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. N.K. Singh and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode) CM APPL. 21918/2024
W.P.(C) 5349/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:05:24
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
APRIL 15, 2024/ ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 23:05:24
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondent fix the petitioners' seniority pursuant to the 17.10.2022 order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
HEMANT SHARMA & ORS.
THE LD DISTRICT AND SESSIOIN JUDGE (HQS)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
