Smt Geeta Devi v. Pooja & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition against an election trial court order withdrawn. Bench referred to precedents barring remedies against judicial orders under Art 226 and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach other available legal forums.
What the court decided
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 784/2024 & CM APPL. 3394/2024 SMT GEETA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Omprakash Gupta, Mr. Radhy Shyam, Advocates.
versus POOJA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Advocate for R-1 (9212717379). Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Ms. Aparna Singh, Advocates for R-2 and 3 ([email protected]. Mob-9818087744).
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 12.11.2024
- This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed against a judgment dated 10.10.2023 passed by the Court of the Additional District Judge in an election petition filed by the petitioner herein.
- The prayers in the writ petition are as follows:
- “a. Issue a writ mandamus and / or any appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and quash and set aside the impugned order dated 10.10.2023 passed by Ms. Vandana, Ld. ADJ, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition against a judicial order in an election petition be allowed.
Whether the writ petition is withdrawn with liberty to approach other forums.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Geeta Devi
- respondent
Pooja & Ors.
Coram
Prateek Jalan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court