Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner on second call, indicating the petitioner did not wish to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
M/S DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAY HOSPITAL ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
VIKASH ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Radha Shyam Jena, Advocate (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 09.02.2024
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on second call. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 dy/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:37:50
M/S DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAY HOSPITAL
VIKASH
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
