Dismissed
Ram Prakash v. Dtc & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/12885/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called. The writ petition along with accompanying application was dismissed in default without any substantive decision or legal proposition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-227
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12885/2006 and CM APPL No.1108/2009
¶3
RAM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner
¶4
Through: None.
¶5
versus DTC & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Manisha Tyagi and Mr.Harsh Chaudhary, Advocates
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶8
O R D E R % 08.02.2024
¶9
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called.
¶10
The petition along with accompanying application is thus dismissed in default.
¶11
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
¶12
FEBRUARY 8, 2024 SV
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ram Prakash
- respondent
DTC & ANR
Coram
AI extract
Chandra Dhar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court