Application seeking timeline for implementation of a prior judgment was dismissed. The court expressed hope for expeditious compliance with the earlier order in the main writ petition but did not stay implementation or grant any relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
AKSHAR REDDY VANGA AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY SUBBA REDDY VANGA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Mr. Prashant Tyagi and Mr. P. Srinivas Reddy, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 28.05.2024 CM APPL. 32470/2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 28, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/05/2024 at 12:18:38
Akshar Reddy Vanga and Anr.
Union of India and Ors.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
